Perfection, Power and the Passions in Spinoza and Leibniz
نویسنده
چکیده
I In a short piece written most likely in the 1690s and given the title by Loemker of “On Wisdom,” Leibniz says the following: “...we see that happiness, pleasure, love, perfection, being, power, freedom, harmony, order, and beauty are all tied to each other, a truth which is rightly perceived by few.” Why is this? That is, why or how are these concepts tied to each other? And, why have so few understood this relation? Historians of philosophy are familiar with the fact that both Spinoza and Leibniz place strong emphasis on the notion of power in giving their accounts of the human passions. But, while many scholars have explicated the relation between power and the passions (especially in Spinoza’s philosophy), there has been considerably less attention given to the nature of perfection and its relation to both power and the passions. Consider the following passages from Spinoza and Leibniz in which these two thinkers seem to bring together the issue of perfection and passion. In Ethics IIIp11s, Spinoza says the following:
منابع مشابه
Democracy and the Multitude Spinoza against Negri
Negri celebrates a conception of democracy in which the concrete powers of individual humans are not alienated away, but rather are added together: this is a democracy of the multitude. But how can the multitude act without alienating anyone’s power? To answer this difficulty, Negri explicitly appeals to Spinoza. Nonetheless, in this paper, I argue that Spinoza’s philosophy does not support Neg...
متن کاملSpinoza , the No Shared Attribute thesis , and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
1 Introduction According to Spinoza, 'In Nature there cannot be two or more substances of the same nature or attribute' (IP5). 1 Call this the 'No Shared Attribute' thesis, 2 hereafter NSA. It is widely recognised (indeed, virtually undeniable) that NSA plays a crucial role in Spinoza's argument in The Ethics for his version of substance monism—for the view that there exists only one substance,...
متن کاملSpinoza on Method
By interrupting the traditional approach to the distinctiveness of the order of knowledge and the order of nature (which was the procedure of many philosophers like Aristotle, and his scholastic disciples, more especially of Thomas Aquinas and even Descartes and Cartesian), and acquiring a unified science, Spinoza changes the customary order of philosophizing and begins his famous book, Ethics,...
متن کاملLogic and Existence
I am going to talk today about the ontological argument for the existence of God as formulated by the 11th Century Archbishop of Canterbury, St. Anselm. I want to assure you in advance that I have not chosen this topic because I think the ontological argument is especially persuasive. In fact when I first heard the argument at college from some of my fellow students, I thought they were pulling...
متن کاملE Differential Point of View of the Infinitesimal Calculus in Spinoza, Leibniz Anddeleuze
In Hegel au Spinosa:' Pierre Macherey challenges the influence of Hegel's reading of Spinoza by stressing the degree to which Spinoza eludes the grasp of the Hegelian dialectical progression of the history of philosophy. He argues that Hegel provides a defensive misreading of Spinoza, and that he had to "misread him" in order to maintain his subjective idealism. The suggestion being that Spinoz...
متن کامل